In his early years of the Diplomatic Corps, Pope Ratzinger has been very clear in both requests in both sentences. One deficiency: not conclude with the usual formula "is anathema" for those who, of course, submit himself to the will of those who for twenty centuries, sometimes with hypocrisy, others with violence and deceptions of every kind, has clouded the minds of 'humanity, claiming the only truth and the one God and made all sorts of mischief with the cry "God wills it" ... Even against fellow Christians as it did with what was called "The Albigensian Crusade." The crusade took place between 1209 and 1229 and was called by Pope Innocent III. I want to remember, to His Holiness, the massacre of Béziers them only through the work of Catholics under the command of the papal legate Amaury. The indiscriminate massacre all the citizens of Béziers - resulted in the deaths of some 20,000 people as is evident from a letter sent by the pope himself. To emphasize the cruelty of the papal legate, the chronicler of Heisterbach Cesario said that when the legate was asked how he could identify the heretics among the refugees in a church, said: "Kill them all. God will recognize his own. " The Catholic Church has called for tolerance until the Edict of Milan in 313. After he showed all his intransigence destroying temples, burning books (Library of Alexandria), imposing his beliefs by coercion to death and persecuting non-Christians who refused to abjure their religion ... hundreds of thousands of deaths. So, what about religious freedom Pope Ratzinger?
What threats can cause sexual education and civil (so called) taught in state schools in Europe? It is certainly the fear of relativism that grips the pope and the Roman hierarchy. Relativism is not a religion or rather, not an ideology, but the individual search for truth, awareness of their own spirituality without preconceived truth, fell from the top and dotted with dogmas and traditions often illogical and unrealistic. Relativism is the engine of the progress of history and soul. I do not understand why the state should abdicate its duty to inform and educate its citizens, giving them the tools to search a conscious respect for all religious movements without stating a claim as true and absolute. And do not even understand why people should give up the right to education secular, that does not presuppose any religious war, but leads to awareness del confronto e dell’accettazione del diverso … anche in campo religioso. Rifletta, papa Ratzinger, sull’indebita intrusione nella formazione religiosa dei bambini, costretti a essere cattolici sin dalla scuola materna, dopo aver fatto violenza col battesimo, quando nel Vangelo si parla di un battesimo consapevole dopo l’acquisizione della fede. Perché le scuole coraniche sono da criticare e il catechismo deve essere permesso, anzi … imposto?
Afferma che in certi Paesi (quali? Sarebbe opportuno fare i nomi per capire) occidentali dove “si accorda una grande importanza al pluralismo e alla tolleranza” e “la religione subisce una crescente emarginazione” e “si tende a considerare la religione come un fattore senza importanza, estraneo alla società moderna o addirittura destabilizzante e si cerca con diversi mezzi di impedire con diversi mezzi di impedirne ogni influenza nella vita sociale”. Dove sta scritto che l’etica laica è inferiore all’etica predicata dalla Chiesa di Roma? Perché uno Stato democratico deve subire l’influenza delle religioni, anzi la sua ingerenza, come avviene in Italia? Lo Stato, ogni Stato, deve avere come obiettivo la costruzione di una società fondata sulla giustizia e sul benessere dell’uomo, tenendo conto della tolleranza religiosa e della pluralità delle opinioni, senza discriminare le minoranze per le loro diversità. Il diritto di every minority in a state of law as the democratic state, it is the right of everyone to have most of their lives and their way of life. The conscientious objector, who is also an official of the State, must ensure that the citizen who asks to use the power of law enforcement, as in the case of abortion, hypocrisy is not used to losing the power over the weak ... because, in fact, the wealthy, even and especially Catholics, are going abroad, as for artificial insemination.
The Pope is also concerned that some Latin American countries "are likely to create a sort of state monopoly on school, not like the service that religious communities provide for the education of young generations. " He concluded by urging "all governments to educational systems that promote the primordial right (?) Of the families to decide about their children's education and inspiration to the principles of subsidiarity, which is essential to organize a just society."
If the States do not appreciate, there must be a reason and fundamentalism is expressed by the Church of Rome. I do not believe that the peoples of Latin America have forgotten the forced conversions made by the priests who served in the armed wing of the Portuguese and English, as they have not forgotten the destruction of their civil and religious culture. How many deaths have led to the forced conversion and colonialism in A. Latin America under the sign of the cross? How many treasures have been stolen, as exploitation, poverty has generated much? States do well to steal the education of the young generation to "this" power-hungry Church. Pope Ratzinger forget that in Italy there is only one world, obliging and corrupt, but ready to take a lot of concessions in a plot that will implode sooner or later - yes (nobis) of Faventia.
The Pope speaks as a head of state and, in fact, it is. But in his supreme arrogance to think they are above the states. If so why not talk of revolt Bread in Tunisia with the police firing on the crowd hungry causing as many as 50 dead? Why not excommunication mobsters who contribute so much to the social degradation extortion and impoverishing the people. And ... because politicians do not speak Italian politicians ... of accommodating Italian politicians who take away the public to give to a Church already rich in her, his faith-based schools, including Catholic universities? The principle of subsidiarity, where the state does not arrive, the Church holds her hands open ... - is a just principle, but a serious state building public facilities and prepares appropriate personnel. Families have the right to choose the education of the children pay the ... service to anyone who offers it without resorting to the state, the contribution of all other citizens, knowing that the sectarian schools benefit those who are defined in the parlance of the "sons of the pope." It is true, it always rains in the wet!
0 comments:
Post a Comment