Beautiful Agonydailymotion

UNA POLITICA PICCOLA SMALL

I am neither a lawyer nor a constitutional expert, but a citizen who believes in the equality of all citizens as stated in art. 3 of the Constitution: "All citizens have equal social dignity and are equal before the law, without distinction of sex, race, language, religion, political opinion, personal and social conditions." The amendment to the so called "Lodo (?) Alfano Constitution" adopted at the Constitutional Affairs Committee of the Senate with a vote of all the majority, Fini and including Lombardo, does not go in that direction, but it makes the citizens more equal than others Berlusconi, mortifying the Constitution, but above all law-abiding citizens.

Like the amnesty, then the tax shield, which gives the right to evade taxes, allowing tax evaders to the same way the "ruling" gives the right for one person, even if voted (or designated, as it welcomes Berlusconi himself to speak) by the people to be more equal and the others. The amendment states that "the processes of the President of the Republic or the Prime Minister, also related to events preceding the taking of office, may be suspended by decision of the parliament. "

a first anomaly is evident as big as a house: the involvement of the President of the Republic, to make the "award" more credible and better publicize it in all locations Media-rays and in the press as a friend over the dispute about Berlusconi. In that respect, it should, however, point out that the President of the Republic does not need any award, as the art. 90 of the Constitution states: "The President of the Republic is not liable for acts performed in the exercise of his functions, except for high treason or against the Constitution."
The desire to involve the President of the Republic could hide the election of Berlusconi in this position without having to answer to charges of incompatibility: no condemnation would weigh on his person. The conditions of the term of Napolitano are all there. Other seven years of immunity! Then we'll see!
The other anomaly concerns the retroactivity of the fraudulent "award." Crimes involving the President of the Council were committed by them before veneer on this position and not the exercise of its functions. If they occurred before, not concern the exercise of its functions, ergo: every citizen should be judged as the principle of equality and not escape the view. Leading by example and the emergence of the allegations were unfounded, given that claims to be innocent and a victim, would be to change the mind of the people in his regard and to enhance its image.
declares Finian Bongiorno, defender of the law together with Fini and Fel, that "the purpose (of retroactivity) is to safeguard peace in the performance of [...] which, of course, would be jeopardized if they were not processes suspended for acts committed prior to taking charge. "
Mr Berlusconi was not obliged, Mr Bongiorno down in politics or to be the President of the Council. If he did, he was conscious Rules of the Republic or did not know, serious matter, the Constitution. Is consistent with the principle of legality trumpeted from the rooftops from her, by Fini and Fel! But the reason the party, we know, is stronger ... people will understand ... So, has not changed - just gave the impression - no, another group of powers, other public officials who play with the people!
Casini, another champion of the law indicates that Di Pietro as executioner, gave his willingness to vote for the award and, as did the Democrats, so that never arrived, he preceded his consent by a circumlocution that seems to come from the mouth of Crozza (excuse me the comic): "Disturbance, acceptable solution sui generis [...] because our intention is to give a signal of stability and groped to remove the boulder (!) Of the processes of the premier once and for all.." This is plain speaking!
For Bersani's a shame, we will make the barricades. " I think this is a unique opportunity for the opposition to take to the streets ... in all locations in Italy and emphasized the havoc that this majority wants to do with legality. Must fall between citizens and pissed off, civilly, but get angry and do not allow contempt for the institutions. They will find many people on their side.