The President of the Republic voiced ... yet. Speaking at the International Forum on Development of E (of course this forum was held in Italy but not for Italy, since we lack even the money for toner or photocopies) said that "courageous decisions that are needed simplify procedures [...], which fully implement the principles of due process and reduce the duration of proceedings. " Concepts as simple as to seem rhetorical, but that put the finger on the problem in a country that has a lot of open sores.
That justice in our country looks like a tired old elephant is evident, as is clearly evident that every time politicians put you hand the worst mischief. The paradox is that the parliament is often hit by laws of justice ... not the Italians but to "an Italian", what is the most equal of all. 
Take the so-called short trial. Not go into the technical details of equity and constitutional matters because of the technicians and the parliament as a whole and not a part, although the majority, as Justice affects all Italians, and therefore must also be open to the contribution of the opposition through a real debate, no votes of confidence or decrees of necessity.
There is no Italian, which is contrary to shorten the time of the policy, but without this giving, it seems a joke, do justice to an innocent, reducing, instead of time, the provision that relates exclusively to the guilty. But justice is needed to make efficient investment and a reorganization of the Courts. Tremonti, the Italian economy deus, a successful accountant and minister of economy, or find the money, as usual, easier to invent a slogan, say and do? Take the so-called short trial. Not go into the technical details of equity and constitutional matters because of the technicians and the parliament as a whole and not a part, although the majority, as Justice affects all Italians, and therefore must also be open to the contribution of the opposition through a real debate, no votes of confidence or decrees of necessity. The government says at every opportunity that the text of the law of the process is stopped short in parliament to dump the blame on the opposition and the majority (Finian). Ma non è così. Il contendere riguarda la norma transitoria, fatta apposta per salvare dai processi il presidente del consiglio, mettendo fine a centinaia di migliaia di processi tuttora in corso dai quali le parti lese attendono “giustizia”.
E se fosse il presidente del consiglio a fare un passo indietro, recandosi in tribunale a dimostrare la sua innocenza e il fumus persecutionis?
Taglieremmo la testa al toro e ci allineeremmo alle vere democrazie occidentali, dove i premier e i ministri non godono di nessun salvacondotto giudiziario.
0 comments:
Post a Comment