Can Chewing Gum Give You An Upset Stomach

POLICY No. 3

The former interior minister of the previous Berlusconi government, in its capacity as current chairman of the Anti-Mafia Commission has warned: "In the last administration reveals a certain ease in the formation of lists, crowded with people who are not sure worthy to represent anyone. " In

exact number of "unworthy" because we do not know thirty prefectures, in charge of sending information, did not respond or have done so inadequately. Pisanu said that the prefects will be called to give "an answer within a week." Otherwise, the prefects will be to present to the committee.

The prefectures that have not responded, for the sake of truth, are Agrigento, Bolzano, Catania and Messina Mantova. However, this does not mean that all others are free of serious misconduct.
will be the beginning of the ballet: everybody will blame the other for delays or lack of sufficient data. The prefects have already sent an official note in which claim to have sought clarification from the Minister Maroni and that it took account of a movement of that in responding to the Commission.
The situation disclosed by the Commission is unsettling.
The local elections are the first rung of the ladder of politics, where administrators are known in their work and morality and the formation of the lists should be based on transparency.
A loyal and accountable government to respect the law should have the task of cleaning, without pretense and with extreme care regardless of political unworthy of. Then will the public not to vote for them.
What can we expect from a government that has investigated a number of ministers, as well as some parliamentarians?
the other day on TV, I do not remember in which transmission, an undersecretary of the PDL is the guarantor appealed, arguing that there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. In other words, to the third degree of opinion no one is guilty, and thus may participate in the governance of institutions, whether local not national.
Of course, nobody wants to erase the legal guarantees for defendants. But the presumed innocent in the end it may be a culprit. And this "former alleged" we have entrusted the administration of public affairs. This is not justicialism but common sense. No one wants to convict a suspect, but to eliminate any suspicion, political parties should adopt a code of ethics (or better a law) that prohibits the defendants a temporary, until proof of innocence, away from the political institutions. The sponsor often hides
impunity.
We can only hope for a renewed sense of the state.