is obvious l’affermazione di Berlusconi a commento sulla manifestazione delle donne. “La manifestazione, ha affermato Berlusconi, è stata di parte ed è stata strumentale e strumentalizzata”.
È fuor di dubbio che le manifestazioni si fanno contro qualcuno e per qualcosa … sono come gli scioperi. Le donne - è vero ci sono stati numerosi uomini … forse come espiazioni dei peccati di altri – domenica si sono impossessate delle piazze d’Italia al di là di ogni più rosea aspettativa, senza il traino dell’informazione tradizionale e delle organizzazioni riconosciute. È stata una festa – io ci sono stato assieme a mia moglie e ne sono orgoglioso -, vedere donne di ogni età, con cartelloni of dissent in the most serene and ironic but fairly, to express dissent and indignation against the conduct of the President of the Council that between jokes, irony and beauty of the acts of machismo, has reduced the woman, all women - just remember the order given to Iva Zanicchi to leave the transmission 's "Unfaithful," defined as a brothel - to an object. She was instrumental ... but sure. What do you expect? A tool to enhance their indignation and to show that Italy is still indignant people, who wants to change, clean Italy for us and our children. No opposition party or the left, as Berlusconi says, rose on stage, no flag, indicating that there was no demonstration.
It is ignorance - more apparent than real this time - to argue that Berlusconi should be tried by the court of Ministers, his natural judge. M This is true only when the Chairman of the Board acting in its functions: the call to the police does not, as the lawyer knows Mr Ghedini, in any of its functions. On the other hand, Ruby was not the nephew of Mubarak. It is possible that only the president did not know it?
There is the crime of extortion because there is extorted, said he and his defenders. Are you kidding? And the police? Among other the crime of bribery exists, even if none is declared extorted.
And then, because the majority has deferred to the full demand for power Pm searched the office of Spinelli and a voice in the chorus, repeated ad nauseam that only the court of Ministers is responsible? Basically this would consist of three judges chosen by lot among the courts of Milan.
The reason is obvious as well as misleading: the strategy developed in the works for Ghedini has two objectives.
The first, most immediate, tends to pass, as always, Berlusconi as a victim of the Milan judges, which are defined subversive. Poor guy, he wants to be judged ... I do not want them illegally which would be held by a court of Ministers. It is not, however, to them, ie the majority, determine which is the natural judge of Berlusconi. We have seen that is not true that he acted within the scope of his duties and, therefore, lacks the reason for the dispute.
The second, hidden to ordinary people but very obvious to those familiar with the functioning of the parliament, aims to cover-up, ie the annulment of the proceedings against Berlusconi. In fact, the parliament will decide by majority vote whether or not the process needs to be done. Since the government has a majority, the parliament will vote against the procedure, ergo Mr Berlusconi's trial will not be made.
From this emerges a simple question: If Berlusconi is innocent because it does not allow to judge, instead of stonewalling and deceive along with its majority citizens, including their voters, seen as a huge flock of obedient sheep and prone
0 comments:
Post a Comment