When the prime minister - this term is pointed out the chief executive directly elected by the people, we have the correct term is Chairman of the Board and his appointment was sanctioned by a vote of confidence in Parliament - called ministers, advisors and Consigliori, even large-caliber rush.
is the case of a man of immense culture, refined e carismatico direttore del quotidiano “Il foglio” che, nell’appassionata e drammatica ricerca di una collocazione di verità è approdato al sole di Arcore. Non so se, come san Paolo si fermerà – certo chi può dire tra noi miseri mortali di essere arrivato alla fine di un percorso, del proprio percorso, esistenziale? Come si può affermare che questa e non altra sia la verità assoluta? A volte, basta una semplice ricaduta per trovarsi in sintonia … ma non è il caso … Molto spesso la crisi esistenziale, sempre se c’è, porta a quella mistica che, visto che il nostro si definisce ateo devoto, potrebbe essere dietro l’angolo. Pensate quale grande conquista per la Chiesa, what a great work of those who proselytize ... "From the Worm" by replacing the pants something more flashy and less vulgar as a tunic!
I'm not a philosopher, I do not read Kant because I prefer to sleep at night and I'm not hungry polemic of applause.
Giuliano Ferrara, who I'm talking about ... as always I appreciate that, if memory serves me right, a militant in the Italian Communist Party. Old story. His path was full of movement. The office of Secretary of the Berlusconi government, the case Englaro with the collection of bottles of mineral water, his candidacy for leader of the anti-abortion in 2008, his genuflection before Benedict XVI and now his stance against the moralists and the invitation to Berlusconi to participate in the televised debate with opposition leaders, make it a passionate defender of those cases that capture the hearts.
Before concluding, and wish him luck, I must point out that only twice has agreed to deal with the opposition on TV and both times he lost the election.
The prime minister will be judged expedited with the serious charge of extortion and prostitution. In another country, would resign, but there would be another head of government.
is a continuing challenge to the judiciary, a clash between the founding institutions of the state that affect and not just on our daily lives. A defense of the power at any cost as a private instrumentally broadened the electorate that continues to say, with extreme boredom and arrogance, that they voted. That, however, does not mean delegation in white or delegate eternal. And then, in a democracy must feel the pulse of the country, be respectful of institutional rules and have a way of life spotless throughout, because the boundary between the private and the public, if any, is very thin.
Yesterday, the most prominent of the PDL, the usual familiar faces, have once again demonstrated, through various statements, have no respect for the Italians, considered ignorant and treated as fans of a football team: the team that wins ... even if typhoid have rigged the game and the referee bought it.
We see this series of statements that reveal the bad faith or ignorance .... Sometimes ignorance is often but by obsequiousness and cunning.
Alfano (justice minister): "The prosecutor has not taken account of as voted by the parliament," and this is "an issue that concerns the independence, sovereignty and independence of parliament. Berlusconi has a strong mandate given by the Italians. "
The Judiciary can not depend on the exercise of its functions by parliament, but must act attraverso il rispetto dei codici. La Magistratura è uno dei tre poteri fondamentali dello Stato democratico ed è soggetto soltanto alla legge. Tra l’altro, non spetta al parlamento indicare il giudice naturale di un indagato. La magistratura ha rispettato la sovranità e l’indipendenza del parlamento, accettando quanto da questo deliberato in merito alla richiesta di perquisizione dell’ufficio di Spinelli. Il forte mandato conferitogli dagli Italiani non lo rende né al di sopra della legge né più uguale degli altri cittadini.
Gelmini (ministro dell’istruzione): “E’ un vero e proprio attacco alla sovranità popolare … un potere dello Stato che tenta di stravolgere l’equilibrio between the judiciary, legislature and executive. The Italian anomaly is represented by a part of the judiciary that acts with political aims. "
But where is the attack on the sovereignty of the people? Article. 1, paragraph 2, states: "Sovereignty belongs to the people and is exercised in the manner and within the limits of the Constitution." If the people are sovereign, it is not the prime minister, no president of the council. The will of the people do not have any other overhead, what determines their sovereignty. The equation, the people voted for me, so I government. Sure, but government does not mean focused on solving the problems of judicial Chairman of the Board, through laws unconstitutional in personam or praise. The anomaly, therefore, is to discredit the behavior implemented by the prime minister and his ministers.
Brambilla (Minister of Tourism): "Berlusconi victim guilty because they can count on a large consensus among citizens and want to use this power to reform the country."
The great consensus, the largest that a government of the Republic has ever had, would imply the continuation of the election promises that this president and his government have rejected and that has nothing to do with the course of justice.
Prestigiacomo (environment minister): "Against Berlusconi confirmed that the show trial that justice in Italy is the continuation of politics by other means. "
Prestigiacomo The entrepreneur believes the process - which still has not begun - a farce. How do you say? What elements has at its disposal? We participate, Madam Minister, tell us of the evidence in its possession. You throw the stone and then withdraws his hand, talking about a judicial process that does not exist except in their imagination? Have you ever counted how many lawyers have been appointed in the PDL, including the chairman of the defense lawyers?
Meloni (youth minister): "On April 6, the process is not to the prime minister or his government, ma la nostra democrazia”.
Il processo del 6 Aprile ha un imputato: Silvio Berlusconi, presidente del Consiglio. Il processo del 6 Aprile sarà il trionfo della democrazia e della Costituzione su cui si fonda, secondo la quale tutti i cittadini sono uguali di fronte alla legge.
Formigoni (governatore della Lombardia): “Non esiste alcuna ipotesi accusatoria contro Berlusconi … una grande costruzione mediatica con poca sostanza”.
Formigoni ha già emesso il giudizio: nessuna ipotesi accusatoria … l’imputato è innocente … o è un imputato fantasma. Il presidente, oltre ad essere il proprietario di Mediaset e di numerosi organi di stampa, ha una fortissima influenza sulla Rai seems that the only media capable of a large building.
Cicchitto (parent company of the room): "One can speak of justice that Berlusconi is ticking fast ...."
But the majority did not challenge a law on the trial brief? The only difference is that the bill provides for retroactive and, therefore, the cancellation of Mr Berlusconi's ongoing trials and thousands of other processes like Parmalat and others.
Wolves (vice president of the chamber): "There is an Italian prosecutor who, through a survey laughable, is trying to overturn the democratic order. The offensive launched by magistrates against the prime minister has no precedent in Italy and worldwide. "
No doubt it is a subversive action. Mr uses violent language - study laughable overturn the democratic order, the magistrates offensive - to a state power. In other parts of the world, for example in Israel or in England or the U.S. for much less than the prime minister have resigned as soon as they had only a hint of legal proceedings against them. How does Wolf ludicrous to judge the investigation, and thus opening up the process for Prime Minister? Evidence has to be shown? He has evidence of a conspiracy? If the public has because the kidney?
0 comments:
Post a Comment